🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in graves at risk from shoreline retreat state that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the issue is creating avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being consumed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation details a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure sites. Officials maintain it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while serving abroad. His mother said she lost sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to think this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Certainty

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some want additional coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to continue for now. Others contend the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the path to take. We are here to help support them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires good local conversations to find the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, providing a theological viewpoint on the physical loss of sacred ground.